UK Regulatory Disclosures

A. Pillar 1, 2, 3 Disclosure

1. Introduction
The European Capital Requirements Directive (“CRD”) introduced capital adequacy standards and an associated supervisory framework in the EU based on the Basel II rules. It affects banks, building societies as well as certain investment firms. The Directive was introduced into the UK by the Financial Services Authority. The new framework consisted of three ‘pillars’.

Pillar 1
The minimum capital required by a firm to meet credit, market and operational risk.

Pillar 2
A regular assessment of a firm’s regulatory capital, through a process known as the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (“ICAAP”), which determines whether the amount of internal capital is sufficient to cover all the risks to which the firm is exposed or whether additional capital needs to be held against the risks not covered in Pillar 1.

Pillar 3
This introduces public disclosure of qualitative and quantitative information and is aimed to encourage market discipline by providing market participants access to key information on a firm’s capital, risk exposures and risk management processes.

The rules in BIPRU 11 set out the Pillar 3 requirements. This document is designed to meet the Pillar 3 requirements. The rules permit Polygon to omit any information that is considered immaterial, such that its omission would be unlikely to change or influence the decision of those relying on that information. In addition, Polygon may omit required disclosures which it regards as propriety or confidential. Propriety information is that which may undermine Polygon’s competitive position if it is shared. Information is considered to be confidential where there are obligations binding Polygon to confidentiality with its customers, suppliers and counterparties.

No omissions have been made on the grounds that the relevant information is propriety or confidential.  Certain information has been omitted on the ground that it is immaterial (see the section headed “Items omitted from the Pillar 3 Disclosures”).

2. Scope and application

Polygon is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”) and as such is subject to minimum capital requirements, based on its categorization as a BIPRU firm.

Polygon serves or, in the future may serve, as the investment manager to various funds and other investment vehicles and accounts.

Polygon does not form part of a consolidation group for prudential purposes. The LLP was authorised by the Financial Services Authority from 4th  of May, 2011 and became authorised by the FCA on 1st  of April 2013.

3. Risk Management and the Risk Management Process

Polygon is governed by an Executive Committee. The Risk Committee and Infrastructure Committee report to the Executive Committee and with their input the Executive Committee determines the business strategy and risk appetite for Polygon. The Executive Committee includes Polygon’s Chief Executive Officer.

For various reasons, the Executive Committee considers that from a regulatory capital perspective, Polygon is a relatively low risk organization. For example Polygon does not directly take custody of any investor assets.

Due to the small size of Polygon and its relatively low risk profile, the Executive Committee considers that Polygon does not warrant the need for a separate risk management function within Polygon. Risk management is undertaken by the Risk Committee with the assistance of the CEO together with support from internal compliance, legal and operations teams. In addition, Polygon retains external professional services firms for expert advice and consultation, as and where considered appropriate.

The Executive Committee, through formal and informal meetings, is actively involved in determining Polygon’s business strategy and implementing processes to mitigate risks. Polygon’s risk profile is assessed, as part of the ICAAP process, at least annually and more frequently as and when the need arises, at the discretion of the Executive Committee.

The Executive Committee also determines how the risks Polygon faces may be mitigated and assesses the arrangements to manage those risks on an ongoing basis. The Executive Committee meets both formally and informally to discuss current projections for profitability, cash flow, regulatory capital management, business planning and risk management. The Executive Committee manages Polygon’s business and identifies risks through a framework of policy and procedures taking account of relevant laws, standards, principles and rules (including FCA principles and rules) with the aim of operating a defined and transparent risk management framework. These policies and procedures are updated as required.

The Executive Committee has identified that credit, business and operational, and market risks are the main areas of risk to which Polygon is exposed. The Executive Committee formally review the risks, controls and other risk mitigation arrangements and assesses their effectiveness. Where the Executive Committee identifies material risks, it considers the financial impact of these risks as part of Polygon’s business planning and capital management and concludes whether the amount of regulatory capital is adequate.

4. Credit Risk

Client Concentration
Polygon’s clients may include funds and other investment vehicles and accounts. This may result in a high client concentration risk. Polygon is financially dependent upon the Funds and separate accounts. Their continued support is enshrined in their management agreements.

5. Business and Operational Risk

Operational risk is defined by the FCA as the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events, including legal risk. The Management Committee has identified relevant risks and related mitigation and controls as part of its ICAAP review.

Polygon has policies and procedures and ongoing operational and related compliance monitoring to help identify weaknesses and potential control failures which are required to be reported promptly when observed to the Executive Committee.

6. Market Risk

The Executive Committee believes that Polygon’s market risks, which include the potential effects of a long term downturn in financial markets and foreign currency exchange risk, would not have a direct material effect on Polygon due to its funding relationship with the Funds.

7. Regulatory Capital

Polygon’s capital position as at the year ended 31 December 2017 was as follows:

Capital Item


Tier 1 Capital


Total Tier 2 and Tier 3 Capital




Total Available Capital after Deductions


The LLP is a relatively small firm with a simple operational infrastructure. The LLP’s market risk is mainly limited to foreign exchange risk on its foreign currency cash balances. In addition, the LLP is subject to credit risk on management and performance fees receivable from the Funds. The LLP follows the standardised approach to market risk and the simplified standard approach to credit risk. The LLP is subject to the Fixed Overhead Requirement and is not required to calculate operational risk capital though it considers this as part of its process to identify the level of risk based capital required

Polygon is a BIPRU firm for the purposes of the FCA’s capital requirements rules and, as such, its minimum capital requirement is the greatest of: 

  • The base capital requirement of €50,000;
  • The sum of its market and credit risk requirements; and
  • The 13 Week Fixed Overheads Requirement (“FOR”).

The Executive Committee considers that the available capital at 31 December 2017 more than adequately exceeds the minimum capital requirement of the FOR.

The LLP’s capital requirements for regulatory purposes as at the year ended 31 December 2017 is summarised as follows:

Requirement Item


Base capital requirement


Sum of market and credit risk requirement


Fixed overhead requirement


Total Available Capital after Deductions


As at 31 December 2017 the LLP’s regulatory capital requirement is $4,856 and the LLP’s regulatory capital of $8,515 exceeds the minimum capital requirement by $3,659. As such, the LLP’s regulatory capital exceeds its regulatory capital requirement by 175%.

Items omitted from the Pillar 3 Disclosures

Polygon’s  minimum capital requirement under Pillar 1 is driven by its FOR and not the sum of its credit risk and market risk requirements.  Polygon has, accordingly, concluded that the detailed disclosure requirements in relation to credit risk and market risk set out in BIPRU 11.5.4R(2)-(4), BIPRU 11.5.5-11.5.13R, and BIPRU 11.5.15R-11.5.16R may be excluded from the Pillar 3 Disclosures on the grounds that they are immaterial (in accordance with BIPRU 11.3.5R).

Polygon does not engage in securitization activity and the securitization disclosures in BIPRU 11.5.17R are not applicable.  Polygon has, therefore, concluded that it is permitted to exclude such disclosures from the Pillar 3 Disclosures on the grounds that they are immaterial (in accordance with BIPRU 11.3.5R).

B. Remuneration

The LLP maintains a written remuneration policy designed to comply with the rules and guidance relating to the FCA’s Remuneration Code as it applies to BIPRU firms (the “Remuneration Rules”). The LLP’s remuneration policy applies to its members and employees whose professional activities have a material impact on the LLP’s risk profile (“Remuneration Code Staff”). The LLP’s Executive Committee oversees the LLP’s remuneration of Remuneration Code Staff.

The total compensation of Remuneration Code Staff is generally structured as a base salary or, in the case of LLP members, a fixed profit allocation and a year-end bonus or, in the case of LLP members, a discretionary profit allocation. The payment of any such year-end bonus or year-end distribution of profits is subject to various conditions and the amount may be zero under certain circumstances. In the case of other Remuneration Code Staff, the amount of any year-end bonus or year-end distribution of profits is entirely discretionary and is based on a number of considerations, including, among other things, the relevant member of staff’s experience and performance in the role, the overall performance of the investment strategy that the employee supports (if applicable), the profitability of the Polygon group, and competitive pay practices and industry benchmarks. The relative weight accorded to each of these factors is also discretionary.

A portion of any year-end bonus or, as the case may be, year-end distribution of profits awarded to Remuneration Code Staff is subject to mandatory deferral. Deferred amounts may be invested in one or more of the private investment funds managed by the Polygon group and/or shares in the Firm’s listed affiliate, Tetragon Financial Group Limited (TFG). Remuneration Code Staff who voluntarily elect to leave Polygon (other than in connection with retirement) will typically forfeit all or significant portions of their unvested deferred compensation and thus have an economic incentive to remain with Polygon..

Polygon takes into account the specific nature of its own activities (including the nature of its revenues) in conducting any ex-ante risk adjustments to year-end bonuses. Polygon has elected not to make ex-post risk adjustments to year-end bonuses, as permitted under the Remuneration Rules. Polygon may, however, reduce prior year deferred compensation awards under certain circumstances.

All Remuneration Code Staff support Polygon’s investment management activities (Polygon’s only “business area” for purposes of the Remuneration Rules) and either are “senior managers” of Polygon or perform a significant influence function.

C. Commitment to the UK Stewardship Code

Under Rule 2.2.3R of the FCA’s Conduct of Business Sourcebook, Polygon Global Partners LLP (“Polygon”) is required to include on this website a disclosure about the nature of its commitment to the UK Financial Reporting Council’s Stewardship Code (the “Code”) or, where it does not commit to the Code, its alternative investment strategy. The Code is a voluntary code and sets out a number of principles relating to engagement by investors with UK equity issuers.

Polygon acts as the investment manager to one or more private investment funds and other accounts (collectively the “Polygon Clients”). Polygon’s investment strategy is such that the Polygon Clients may hold long positions in equities, including UK equities. The Code is therefore relevant to some aspects of Polygon’s trading on behalf of the Polygon Clients.

While Polygon generally supports the objectives that underlie the Code, it has chosen not to commit to the Code. Polygon’s investment strategy involves the Polygon Clients holding positions in a variety of asset classes and in a variety of jurisdictions globally. Polygon’s approach in relation to engagement with issuers (and members of their management teams) in all of the jurisdictions in which the Polygon Clients invest is determined on a case-by-case basis. Consequently, Polygon does not consider it appropriate to commit to any particular voluntary code of practice relating to any individual jurisdiction.

D. Polygon*: Modern Slavery Statement 

Polygon: Modern Slavery Statement

*Polygon includes Tetragon Financial Group Limited and its subsidiaries, including Polygon Global Management Limited, TFG UK RE Ltd, and Polygon Global Partners LLP.  Polygon Global Partners LLP is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority.

E. MiFID II RTS 28 Disclosure

2018 RTS 28 Disclosure

2017 RTS 28 Disclosure

F. Shareholder Rights Directive

Polygon Global Partners LLP is currently considering whether it will adopt an engagement policy pursuant to Article 3g of the amended EU Shareholder Rights Directive (Directive 2007/36/EC).  When that decision has been made, this webpage will be updated accordingly.